![]() ![]() The front sight is TRUGLO TFO instead of a SIGLITE. It has a false ‘magwell’ made of extended handguards. Since my TACOPS is a 9mm, it came with four 20-round magazines. When I stray from the brand, it’s usually for good cause. I just so happen to find SIG works well for me. I’ve owned a GLOCK G19 Gen3, several Walther PPK/s models, an FN FNP-9, and probably a few others I can’t recall. My first ever purchase was a Springfield XD-45. I had professional instruction on an M9 after shooting the 92FS as a teenager as well. 22 pistol I learned to shoot on as a kid, and I had fired dozens of others. My opinions here have been formed after about 2000 rounds of various ammo through the TACOPS, and uncountable sums through other models.īefore finding SIG SAUER, I had owned several 1911s, a Beretta 92FS, some. ![]() Since you’re here anyway, let’s talk about the merits and drawbacks of a TACOPS model to any of the other P226 choices available, and some SIG siblings. I’m not going to compare the SIG SAUER P226 TACOPS to a GLOCK G17 because the two don’t compare. ![]() I’m not here to gloat, brag, or convince you of anything. This won’t be one of those stuffy historical or scientific reviews. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |